The role of event in building the identity of the deliberated language in architecture: Contemporary Iraqi architecture as a case study

Abstract

The vast majority of individuals since humankind starting, until today to keep up greatness socially and uniqueness, socially and broadly, so minded to have the personality of help in maintaining people in social orders, character is a component, an extravagance no longer delighted in by human, if accessible, it is the premise of his activities, and the objective has consistently It is the support for, his aggregate presence[1, 2]. At the point when the presence, and endurance of the individual are undermined, by occasions, his personality will get on edge and the, character of his general public too. As architecture, is a human product and a documentary record of “human civilization and intellectual creativity”, architecture has expanded in its manifestation’ and precise behavior to reflect a system, of social values, transforming it into edifices that ,reflect the identity of the place and reflect ,the speech of society and show the process of events ,that pass through it, that ,the real ,role of architecture is the embodiment of contents social in ,building the ,identity of individuals ,and composition based on the nature of the surrounding ,,environment reflecting in there, language, deliberative in addressing the impact of “communication of events and how the society before the event differed from the community after the event”. Razouki alluded to this in her “conversation of the deliberative” (social) design that speaks” to the guidelines, standards or rules that speak” to the inside around which the example of “reasoning and impression of the individual ,who lives in it solidified”, and along these lines speaks, to an arrangement of implications or an ,arrangement of correspondence ,and comprehension, between individuals “(Razouki 1998)” and the degree of change ,and this change in frameworks ,the people group ,shaped from standards, customs and ,qualities speaks to ,by post-occasion, images ,and the degree of their latent ,,capacity and their job in building character and ,techniques ,that are now structured in ,light of the occasion to keep up the progression of ,its personality by duplicating those ,images ,and markers inside the, system of its individual ,attention to “transform it into an aggregate ,,express that mirrors the regular experience [3, 4].