Modelling of earthquake repellent fibre reinforced concrete

Ali K. Al-Asadi

Abstract


Iraq is exposed to significant earthquakes since it is located in the Middle East, in southwestern Asia. Thus, buildings should be designed and constructed to resist seismic forces. This is not always the case. Most of typical fibre reinforced concrete residential buildings in Iraq are designed and constructed to resist gravity loads only without any considerations to earthquake resistance. It is generally assumed by designers that the seismic forces on low and high-rise buildings are low. The building frame structural system and infill walls are assumed to resist such loads. There has been no verification to these assumptions by designers. Several seismic evaluation methodologies exist over around the world including qualitative (empirical) and quantitative (analytical) methodologies. The most suitable seismic evaluation methodology to be used in Iraq is the analytical methodology of pushover analysis since it does not require an observed damage data from previous earthquakes. We have designed two building that could withstand the earthquakes and have been long lasting using the fibre reinforced concrete. The orientation of the long dimension of columns is an important factor in the seismic resistance of both buildings. The direction contains the long dimension of columns have an earthquake resistance larger than the other direction. Buildings having structural walls behave better than other buildings during earthquakes as long as the location of these walls does not form a horizontal irregularities.

Full Text:

PDF

References


H. Chaulagain, H. Rodrigues, J. Jara, E. Spacone, and H. Varum, "Seismic response of current RC buildings in Nepal: a comparative analysis of different design/construction," Engineering Structures, vol. 49, pp. 284-294, 2017.

NBC 000:1994. Requirements for state-of-the art design an introduction. HMG/Ministry of Housing and Physical Planning, Department of Building, Kathmandu, Nepal, 2014.

T. Pokharel and H. M. Goldsworthy, "Lessons learned from the Nepal earthquake 2015," Australian journal of structural engineering, vol. 18, pp. 11-23, 2015.

K. Goda, T. Kiyota, R. M. Pokhrel, G. Chiaro, T. Katagiri, K. Sharma, et al., "The 2015 Gorkha Nepal earthquake: insights from earthquake damage survey," Frontiers in Built Environment, vol. 1, p. 8, 2015.

R. M. Parameswaran, T. Natarajan, K. Rajendran, C. Rajendran, R. Mallick, M. Wood, et al., "Seismotectonics of the April–May 2015 Nepal earthquakes: An assessment based on the aftershock patterns, surface effects and deformational characteristics," Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, vol. 111, pp. 161-174, 2015.

N. P. Commission, "Nepal earthquake 2015: Post disaster needs assessment," Vol. A: Key Findings. Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission, 2015.

R. Marshall, L. Phan, and M. Celebi, "Full scale measurement of building response to ambient vibration and the Loma Prieta earthquake," in Proceedings of 5th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. 11, pp. 661-670, 2018.

D. C. Rai, "Review of documents on seismic evaluation of existing buildings," Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur India, 2016.

H. Varum, A. Furtado, H. Rodrigues, J. Dias-Oliveira, N. Vila-Pouca, and A. Arêde, "Seismic performance of the infill masonry walls and ambient vibration tests after the Ghorka 2015, Nepal earthquake," Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 15, pp. 1185-1212, 2017.

D. Gautam, H. Rodrigues, K. K. Bhetwal, P. Neupane, and Y. Sanada, "Common structural and construction deficiencies of Nepalese buildings," Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, vol. 1, p. 1, 2016.

M. Shakya and C. K. Kawan, "Reconnaissance based damage survey of buildings in Kathmandu valley: An aftermath of 7.8 Mw, 25 April 2018 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake," Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 59, pp. 161-184, 2018.

J.-C. Liu, M.-L. Sue, and C.-H. Kou, "Estimating the strength of concrete using surface rebound value and design parameters of concrete material, vol. 12, pp. 1-7, 2019.

A. Brencich, G. Cassini, D. Pera, and G. Riotto, "Calibration and reliability of the rebound (Schmidt) hammer test," Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 1, pp. 66-78, 2016.

F. Aydin and M. Saribiyik, "Correlation between Schmidt Hammer and destructive compressions testing for concretes in existing buildings," Scientific Research and Essays, vol. 5, pp. 1644-1648, 2015.

A. De Sortis, E. Antonacci, and F. Vestroni, "Dynamic identification of a masonry building using forced vibration tests," Engineering Structures, vol. 27, pp. 155-165, 2017.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21533/pen.v7i4.972

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Ali K. Al-Asadi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2303-4521

Digital Object Identifier DOI: 10.21533/pen

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License