Intrusion detection system in gas-pipeline industry using machine learning

Ali Hasan Dakheel, Awfa Hasan Dakheel, Haider Hadi Abbas

Abstract


In this paper, we study about the plausibility of building up a total intrusion identification framework for gas pipeline industry utilized in present day man-made AI based frameworks to tell a gas controller of unexpected changes in pipeline working qualities, for example, weight, time interim, delta pipeline PSI and stream rate. This examination assesses the possibility for utilizing AI example of cautions strategies utilizing three able AI calculations, for example, Decision tree, K-Nearest Neighbor and Neural Network to recognize breaks in gas frameworks, like the SCADA rate of progress blend philosophy utilized by the risky fluids pipeline industry. The highlights were extricated from the dataset by evacuating the repetitive information too cleaning the information. The significant commitment to this work is by utilizing choice tree in three distinct degrees for example randomized, advanced and timberland just as utilizing the neural system with 3 layers, 20 units for each concealed layer, 20 preparing rounds and with 2 layers, 50 preparing rounds as appeared in down to earth some portion of this work executed in Matlab R2019a to recognize and foresee the potential assault in the gas pipeline industry. The idea of AI examination considered here shows guarantee, in light of the aftereffects of gas pipeline burst checking under the conditions tried. It can possibly be formed into a compelling crack checking technique, yet additionally testing under genuine world, complex-framework setups, in participation with appropriate AI demonstrating specialists, is expected to all the more likely comprehend the genuine practicality of this adjustment mechanized innovation. Since gases and fluids display diverse physical practices under changing weight and stream conditions an immediate relationship between's the viability in gas versus fluids frameworks can't be accurately expected that why AI would give the answer for variety in Pipeline PSI and complete delta pipeline PSI. For example, by-passing and back-feeding, and various other framework explicit conditions requiring redid arrangements utilizing AI.

Keywords


Gas-Pipeline Machine learning Optimization Time Interval Intrusion Recognition classification Feature Extraction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chaczykowski, M. Transient flow in natural gas pipeline—The effect of pipeline thermal model Adaptive Vector Quantization. Appl. Math. Model. 2010, 34, 1051–1067.

Nguyen, H.; Chan, C. Optimal scheduling of gas pipeline operation using genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering using Machine Learning, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 1–4 May 2012.

Zlotnik, A.; Chertkov, M.; Backhaus, S. Optimal control of transient flow in natural gas networks using machine learning. In Proceedings of the 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Osaka, Japan, 15–18 December 2015.

Pambour, K.A.; Bolado-Lavin, R.; Dijkema, G.P.J. An integrated transient model for simulating the operation of natural gas transport systems. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2016, 28, 672–690.

Rios-Mercado, R.; Borraz-Sanchez, C. Optimization problems in natural gas transportation systems using Follow-The-Leader (Fdl): A state-of-the-art review. Appl. Energy 2015, 147, 536–555.

Behrooz, H.; Boozarjomehry, R. Modeling and state estimation for gas transmission networks using Machine Learning Algorithms. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2015, 22, 551–570.

Gato, L.; Henriques, J. Dynamic behaviour of high-pressure natural-gas flow in pipelines using Probabilistic Neural Network and Self-Organizing Map. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 2015, 26, 817–825.

Wang, P.; Yu, B.; Han, D.; Li, J.; Sun, D.; Xiang, Y.; Wang, L. Adaptive implicit finite difference method for natural gas pipeline transient flow. Oil Gas Sci. Technol using Neeural Network. Dec-2018.

Sundar, K.; Zlotnik, A. State and parameter estimation for natural gas pipeline networks using transient state data. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2018, 99, 1–15.

Durgut, I.; Leblebicioglu, K. Optimal control of gas pipelines via infinite-dimensional analysis. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2016, 22, 867–879.

Cortinovis, A.; Mercangoz, M.; Zovadelli, M.; Pareschi, D.; de Marco, A.; Bittanti, S. Online performance tracking and load sharing optimization for parallel operation of gas compressors. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2016, 88, 145–156.

Wen, K.; Xia, Z.; Yu, W.; Gong, J. A new lumped parameter model for natural gas pipelines in state space. Energies 11 June 2017.

B. Durakovic, “Thermal Performances of Glazed Energy Storage Systems with Various Storage Materials: An Experimental study”, Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 45, pp. 422-430, 2019.

R. Palalic and Durakovic, B., “Does Transformational Leadership Matters in Gazelles and Mice: Evidence from Bosnia and Herzegovina?”, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 289-308, 2018.

B. Durakovic, “Design for Additive Manufacturing: Benefits, Trends and Challenges”, Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN), vol. 6, pp. 179–191, 2018.

B. Durakovic, Demir, R., Abat, K., and Emek, C., “Lean Manufacturing: Trends and Implementation Issues”, Periodical of Engineering and Natural Sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 130-143 , 2018.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21533/pen.v7i3.512

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Ali Hasan Dakheel, Awfa Hasan Dakheel, Haider Hadi Abbas

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2303-4521

Digital Object Identifier DOI: 10.21533/pen

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License