Location Selection for Wind Plant using AHP and Axiomatic Design in Fuzzy Environment

Merve Cengiz Toklu, Özer Uygun

Abstract


Electricity consumption of the world has been increasing due to increasing population and production amounts, developing technology and increasing automation level. Studies show that the increase will continue in the future and the supply and demand amount should increase depending on the changing world. Renewable energy sources have become crucial due to the traditional energy sources like coal harm the environment nature and human health. Nowadays countries pay more attention to use their own resources in order to maintain their socio-economic and political independence. As awareness of clean energy increases, the usage of renewable energy sources is increasing. The investment costs of renewable energy sources are very high. For this reason, the selection of the location for renewable energy sources is a strategic decision that getting it right the first time. Different criteria are evaluated when selecting the installation location. The priorities of these criteria may be different from each other. In this study, a model was proposed for selecting the location for the installation of wind power plant via using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy Axiomatic Design methods. In the implementation phase of the model, evaluation criteria have been determined and prioritized. In the light of the evaluation criteria, 3 locations have been evaluated and the most suitable one was selected.

Keywords


Renewable energy resources; Wind power; Fuzzy logic; AHP; Axiomatic design

Full Text:

PDF

References


“Republic of Turkey Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources.” [Online]. Available: http://www.enerji.gov.tr/en-US/Pages/Wind. [Accessed: 23-Oct-2018].

C. Kahraman, I. Kaya, and S. Cebi, “A comparative analysis for multiattribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process,” Energy, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1603–1616, 2009.

C. Kahraman and I. Kaya, “A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 6270–6281, 2010.

B. Wang, D. F. Kocaoglu, T. U. Daim, and J. Yang, “A decision model for energy resource selection in China,” Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 7130–7141, 2010.

J. R. San Cristóbal, “Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in spain: The Vikor method,” Renew. Energy, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 498–502, 2011.

F. E. Boran, K. Boran, and T. Menlik, “The Evaluation of Renewable Energy Technologies for Electricity Generation in Turkey Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS,” Energy Sources, Part B Econ. Planning, Policy, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 81–90, 2012.

O. Demirtas, “Evaluating the Best Renewable Energy Technology for Sustainable Energy Planning,” Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy, vol. 3, pp. 23–33, 2013.

S. Ahmad and R. M. Tahar, “Selection of renewable energy sources for sustainable development of electricity generation system using analytic hierarchy process: A case of Malaysia,” Renew. Energy, vol. 63, pp. 458–466, 2014.

Y. Çelikbilek and F. Tüysüz, “An integrated grey based multi-criteria decision making approach for the evaluation of renewable energy sources,” Energy, vol. 115, pp. 1246–1258, 2016.

H. Aras, Ş. Erdoǧmuş, and E. Koç, “Multi-criteria selection for a wind observation station location using analytic hierarchy process,” Renew. Energy, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1383–1392, 2004.

J. Zhu and K. Cheung, “Selection of wind farm location based on fuzzy set theory,” in IEEE PES General Meeting, 2010, pp. 1–6.

A. Azadeh, S. F. Ghaderi, and M. R. Nasrollahi, “Location optimization of wind plants in Iran by an integrated hierarchical Data Envelopment Analysis,” Renew. Energy, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1621–1631, 2011.

R. Van Haaren and V. Fthenakis, “GIS-based wind farm site selection using spatial multi-criteria analysis (SMCA): Evaluating the case for New York State,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 3332–3340, 2011.

D. Choudhary and R. Shankar, “An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India,” Energy, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 510–521, 2012.

W. Yun-Na, Y. Yi-Sheng, F. Tian-Tian, K. Li-Na, L. Wei, and F. Luo-Jie, “Macro-site selection of wind/solar hybrid power station based on Ideal Matter-Element Model,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 50, pp. 76–84, 2013.

N. C. Chatterjee and G. K. Bose, “A COPRAS-F base multi-criteria group decision making approach for site selection of wind farm,” Decis. Sci. Lett., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2013.

K. B. Atici, A. B. Simsek, A. Ulucan, and M. U. Tosun, “A GIS-based Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis approach for wind power plant site selection,” Util. Policy, vol. 37, pp. 86–96, 2015.

D. Latinopoulos and K. Kechagia, “A GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation for wind farm site selection. A regional scale application in Greece,” Renew. Energy, vol. 78, pp. 550–560, 2015.

S. Ali, S.-M. Lee, and C.-M. Jang, “Determination of the most optimal on-shore wind farm site location using a GIS-MCDM methodology: Evaluating the case of South Korea,” Energies, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1–22, 2017.

C.-N. Wang, V. T. Nguyen, H. T. N. Thai, and D. H. Duong, “Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches for solar power plant location selection in Viet Nam,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1–27, 2018.

B. Daneshvar Rouyendegh, A. Yildizbasi, and Ü. Z. B. Arikan, “Using intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS in site selection of wind power plants in Turkey,” Adv. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 2018, pp. 1–14, 2018.

F. E. Boran, T. Menlik, and K. Boran, “Multi-criteria Axiomatic Design Approach to Evaluate Sites for Grid-connected Photovoltaic Power Plants: A Case Study in Turkey,” Energy Sources, Part B Econ. Planning, Policy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 290–300, 2010.

A. V. Khandekar, J. Antuchevičienė, and S. Chakraborty, “Small hydro-power plant project selection using fuzzy axiomatic design principles,” Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 756–772, 2015.

M. F. Ariza Taba, M. Mwanza, N. S. Çetin, and K. Ülgen, “Assessment of the energy generation potential of photovoltaic systems in Caribbean region of Colombia,” Period. Eng. Nat. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 55–60, 2017.

M. Mwanza, J. Chachak, N. S. Çetin, and K. Ülgen, “Assessment of Solar Energy Source Distribution and Potential in Zambia,” Period. Eng. Nat. Sci., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 103–116, 2017.

M. K. Yeşilyurt, İ. V. Öner, G. Ömeroğlu, and E. Ç. Yılmaz, “A scrutiny study on wave energy potential and policy in TURKEY,” Period. Eng. Nat. Sci., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 286–297, 2017.

T. L. Saaty, The analytic hierarchy process. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1980.

D.-Y. Chang, “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 649–655, 1996.

N. P. Suh, The Principles of Design. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.

N. P. Suh, Axiomatic Design Advances and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.

C. Kahraman, S. Cebi, and İ. Kaya, “Selection among Renewable Energy Alternatives Using Fuzzy Axiomatic Design : The Case of Turkey,” J. Univers. Comput. Sci., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 82–102, 2010.

O. Kulak and C. Kahraman, “Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 170, no. 2–4, pp. 191–210, 2005.

O. Kulak and C. Kahraman, “Multi-attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 415–424, 2005.

O. Kulak, M. B. Durmuşoǧlu, and C. Kahraman, “Fuzzy multi-attribute equipment selection based on information axiom,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 169, no. 3, pp. 337–345, 2005.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21533/pen.v6i2.198

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Merve Cengiz Toklu, Özer Uygun

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2303-4521

Digital Object Identifier DOI: 10.21533/pen

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License